NPR’s Don Gonyea speaks with researcher Vanda Felbab-Brown about why she thinks President Trump’s proposed tariffs and designating cartels as terrorist organizations will not cease the opioid disaster.
DON GONYEA, HOST:
In terms of combating opioids, designating drug cartels as overseas terrorist organizations does much more hurt than good. That is in line with Vanda Felbab-Brown of the Brookings Establishment. She directs the suppose tanks program on the fentanyl epidemic in North America and is an skilled on worldwide organized crime. In a current essay in International Affairs, she argues that terrorism designations and tariffs, each central to President Trump’s plan to gradual the move of opioids, could be disastrous. However she additionally says that threatening the usage of such strategies may very well be helpful. Vanda Felbab-Brown joins me now. Welcome.
VANDA FELBAB-BROWN: Thanks, Don. It is a pleasure to be with you on the present.
GONYEA: You write concerning the two instruments the Trump administration is utilizing to take care of illicit opioids coming into the U.S., tariffs and designating cartels as these overseas terrorist organizations. Briefly, are you able to clarify your No. 1 concern with every strategy? Let’s begin with the tariffs.
FELBAB-BROWN: Completely. So the Trump administration actually moved U.S. drug coverage into completely new domains when it linked it to tariffs and utilized very huge tariffs to U.S. neighbors and core U.S. ally Canada, in addition to to Mexico and to China. And the danger, in fact, is that the tariffs could have a unfavourable financial penalties for every of the nation, together with the US themselves. On the similar time, if the tariffs should not eliminated, if there’s compliance with the counternarcotics calls for that the Trump administration has issued, they turn into meaningless. They only harm the economic system.
GONYEA: After which let’s take a look at the opposite piece of that, the usage of the overseas terrorist group designation. What’s your concern there?
FELBAB-BROWN: Properly, the issue with FTO – the FTO designation is that it actually doesn’t present many expansive regulation enforcement instruments that aren’t there within the first place, however it comes with very expansive, intensive and imprecise materials help clauses. These are materials help clauses that state by U.S. legal guidelines that any form of materials help, as little as a cup of water might be prosecuted beneath U.S. legal guidelines. And there are some exceptions to U.S., however they do not at all times maintain up in U.S. courts and, for that matter, in worldwide courts.
GONYEA: Simply to underscore that time concerning the terrorist group designation, it sounds such as you’re saying, too, it will be dangerous as a result of cartels are sometimes really concerned with a wide selection of authorized companies. What is the problem there?
FELBAB-BROWN: Completely. So today, drug trafficking organizations don’t solely visitors in medication or, for that matter, should not solely engaged in unlawful actions. Definitely in Mexico, they’ve reached unprecedented degree of energy. And extortion of authorized financial actions is a typical day prevalence by nearly all the prison actors in Mexico. And worse than that, the Mexican cartels are even instantly attempting to take over components of authorized economies. That is true in agriculture, in fisheries, in mining, every kind of extractives – in trucking. They not simply extort the businesses. They, actually, owe components of the enterprises. Now, that is very dangerous. It is dangerous for Mexico, and it is actually dangerous for the US, and making a concerted effort to roll again their exercise from authorized economies is essential.
GONYEA: To place it within the easiest phrases potential, an above-the-board, as an example, an American firm could also be doing enterprise with a enterprise they suppose is authorized however has some ties to the cartel someplace, and that might put that preliminary firm, that American firm, in danger.
FELBAB-BROWN: Completely. So the fabric help clauses require knowingly offering materials help. However U.S. actors, whether or not people or firms, are required to do due diligence. And so there’s solely a lot leeway that they will argue that they didn’t know that their counterpart with whom they dealt in Mexico was paying, for instance, extortion charges or had components of the enterprise infiltrated by the cartels.
GONYEA: Historically, diplomacy and regulation enforcement cooperation have been the norm in coping with this problem. Definitely, there are individuals who say, why not do that completely different strategy? How do you reply to that form of a press release?
FELBAB-BROWN: Properly, the problem of attempting one thing that’s so disruptive to relations is that it’s tough to unwind. So you’ll be able to apply tariffs, and you may ultimately again away from them as a result of the opposite nation applies countertariffs. And that is certainly a state of affairs the place we’re with China. President Trump additionally issued a ten% fentanyl-linked tariff on China. China didn’t budge, didn’t supply extra intensive regulation enforcement help up to now. As a substitute, it utilized countertariffs at 15%. And so ultimately we’ll probably see bargaining between the 2 nations that may properly end result within the suspension and weakening of the counternarcotics cooperation that did happen in 2024 after a protracted, several-year pause. And we might be form of again at at the start line, at line zero, in restarting cooperation, and we’ve got wasted time.
GONYEA: That was Vanda Felbab-Brown of the Brookings Establishment. You may learn her piece, “The New Struggle On Medicine,” in International Affairs. Thanks a lot for becoming a member of us.
FELBAB-BROWN: Thanks for having me.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content might not be in its last kind and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might range. The authoritative report of NPR’s programming is the audio report.
