The Nutrivore Rating – The Paleo Mother

How Nutrient Profiling May Inform Dietary Pointers

It makes vastly extra sense to plan a nutrient profiling technique that merely displays the nutritive worth of a meals, after which to check how consuming extra nutrient-dense meals impacts illness danger. In actual fact, there was a 2104 examine of individuals over the age of 55 that confirmed that the upper the NRF9 of their weight loss program as a complete, the decrease their danger of all-cause mortality—the very best NRF9 quartile had a 16% decrease probability of dying than the bottom NRF9 quartile. This examine helps to show that doubtlessly enormous well being good thing about a weight loss program replete with nutrient-dense meals, however extra research like this that incorporate much more vitamins into the calculus are essential to advance this discipline of analysis.

As an example how vital it’s to take a complete strategy to nutrient profiling, check out how ten complete meals rank, when utilizing 9, 15, 20 or 33 vitamins to quantify their nutrient density (within the NRF9, NRF15, NRF20 and Nutrivore Rating, respectively). The extra vitamins which are included in a calculation, when following the NRF mannequin which doesn’t cap a nutrient at 100% DV, the upper the rating may be—that’s why each meals has a better rating when extra vitamins are taken under consideration. Nevertheless, look not solely on the order of the meals, and the way together with extra vitamins gives a extra full image of how nutrient-dense a meals is, but additionally the unfold between the scores. The extra vitamins used within the calculus, the simpler it’s to distinguish between essentially the most nutrient-dense meals and the least. Given what a nutrient powerhouse liver is, it simply is sensible that its rating could be vastly greater than, say, hen breast.

The above desk additionally helps as an example how a single nutrient can dramatically shift the nutrient profiling rating of a particular meals. For instance, zinc will not be included within the NRF9 however is included within the different scores. Oysters are the highest meals supply of zinc, insufficiency of which impacts an estimated 73% of People largely as a result of zinc-rich meals are few and much between and people which are, like oysters, aren’t a standard meals on the Commonplace American Weight-reduction plan. In actual fact, a single serving of oysters comprises 174% DV of zinc! As quickly as zinc is added to the rating, oysters rank way more extremely, which is sensible since they’re such a useful supply of nutritional vitamins, minerals and wholesome fat whereas being a useful supply of zinc!

The perception gleaned from nutrient profiling is profound. It emphasizes the worth of sure households of plant meals (particularly cruciferous greens, mushrooms, leafy greens, and contemporary herbs) whereas additionally elevating the worth of fish, shellfish and organ meat. On the identical time, it emphasizes the excessive caloric density and low nutrient density of grains and dairy merchandise.  This data could be tremendous helpful have been it integrated into the USDA dietary tips, serving to folks to establish essentially the most nutritious meals to eat!

The Downside with Penalizing, Capping and Emphasizing

Some scores penalize for the presence of vitamins whose extra consumption have been (even loosely) linked to well being issues, like sodium, saturated fats, added sugars, and ldl cholesterol.

As I mentioned intimately in Eggs: Nutritious Protein or Ldl cholesterol Bomb?, dietary ldl cholesterol doesn’t improve serum lipids for most individuals and is the spine of vitamin D and different steroid hormones. Dietary saturated fats is barely problematic when consumption exceeds about 15% of whole energy (though this does rely upon genetic predisposition, see Saturated Fats: Healthful, Dangerous, or Someplace In Between? and Genes to Know About: ApoE). Sodium is barely problematic when consumption exceeds about 7 grams per day, and there are research displaying that even this degree is barely worrisome when potassium consumption is concomitantly low, see Is Salt Paleo?. Added sugars turn into problematic above about 10% of whole energy (and 25% of whole carbohydrates), see How Does Sugar Match right into a Wholesome Weight-reduction plan? and TWV Podcast Episode 467: Can Consuming Sugar Every day Be Wholesome?. Most significantly, all of those vitamins are wholesome in average quantities, and solely unhealthy when the entire weight loss program contains extra. And, all of those doubtlessly problematic vitamins are ample in quick meals, junk meals and different hyperpalatable manufactured meals which are additionally low in important vitamins and really excessive in energy—that is why scores that penalize for these vitamins give some of these meals scores lower than zero!

Penalizing particular person meals for the presence of those vitamins doesn’t replicate the weight loss program as a complete, and has the capability to undervalue in any other case nutrient-dense complete meals which may match right into a health-promoting weight loss program, whereas not being mandatory to point out that quick meals and junk meals are unhealthy (they’re nutritionally void sufficient to have already got low scores!).

A few of these scores (just like the NDS) cap a nutrient’s contribution at 100% DV, whereas others acknowledge {that a} meals having greater than a 100% DV of a particular nutrient per serving makes that meals a really useful supply of that nutrient! There’s no such factor as a nutritionally full meals, so the purpose is nutrient sufficiency of the complete weight loss program, not of anybody specific meals. Thus, it’s vital to grasp find out how to mix meals which are good sources of various vitamins to be able to obtain dietary nutrient sufficiency. Capping a nutrient’s contribution to the nutrient density rating at 100% hinders our means to grasp the significance of meals combining for nutrient sufficiency. For instance, Brazil nuts are essentially the most nutrient-dense nut attributable to their very excessive selenium content material—a 1-ounce serving delivers almost 1000% DV of selenium! However, should you capped the contribution of selenium to the calculation of Brazil nut nutrient density, they’d erroneously look like one of many lowest nutrient-density nuts. It simply is sensible to completely worth the superior selenium content material of Brazil nuts and have that mirrored in its nutrient density rating!

One other subject for dialogue is whether or not to weight sure vitamins extra in nutrient profiling.

It is sensible on the floor to depend these vitamins for which a bigger proportion of the inhabitants are poor greater than these vitamins for which only a few individuals are poor. However, right here’s the problem with that logic: the potential for overcorrection and easily shifting in direction of totally different widespread nutrient deficiencies. If these meals which are significantly good sources of the vitamins that, for instance, an estimated 70% or extra of People routinely don’t devour sufficient of (vitamin B9, vitamin D, vitamin E, choline, calcium, potassium, zinc, omega-3 fat, and polyphenols) had inflated scores because of weighting these vitamins extra closely in nutrient profiling, meals sources of different vitamins find yourself being undervalued. This strategy has the capability to shift meals decisions in a manner that would assist handle some inhabitants degree nutrient deficiencies over the quick time period, however that’s not the identical factor as shifting in direction of nutrient sufficiency, particularly over the long run.

After we take a look at nutrient profiling strategies described within the scientific literature, it turns into abundantly clear {that a} nutrient-density rating finest describes a meals when it contains as many vitamins as doable, when the contribution of vitamins aren’t capped at 100% DV, when they’re offered relative to energy, when they aren’t weighted by meals teams, and when they aren’t normalized to a hard and fast scale.

Client-Centered Nutrient Profiling

A number of different nutrient profiling strategies have been devised by non-researchers with the purpose of teaching shoppers, such because the ANDI Rating, NuVal (primarily based on ONQI), Guiding Stars, and Diet IQ.

The ANDI rating could also be one of the crucial complete nutrient profiling programs, however the rating overemphasizes vitamins inherent to plant meals whereas deemphasizing vitamins inherent to animal meals, making a biased outcome. For instance, the ANDI rating incorporates individually into its calculation: beta carotene, alpha carotene, lycopene, lutein and zeaxanthin (all carotenoids); fiber and resistant starch (each fiber); glucosinolates and organosulfides (each organosulfur compounds); phytosterols, angiogenesis inhibitors, aromatase inhibitors, resveratrol and ORAC rating (most plant phytonutrients are antioxidants as are vitamin C and E). Then again, the rating omits protein, practical amino acids and peptides (like anserine, creatine, carnosine, carnitine, and taurine) and all forms of health-promoting fat (like omega-3s, monounsaturated fat, CLA and MCTs).

The ONQI is calculated primarily based on 16 vitamins, with penalties for five vitamins and corrections for fats and protein high quality and for glycemic load. Most notably, solely 5 minerals are included, solely three of the B nutritional vitamins are included, and solely two forms of phytonutrients (flavonoids and carotenoids) are included, whereas vitamin Ok and choline are excluded. As well as, as a result of each ldl cholesterol and saturated fats are penalized (even if whether or not these are problematic is completely context-dependent), animal meals are penalized unnecessarily.

The Guiding Stars system rewards complete grains (regardless of their low nutrient-density in comparison with greens, fruits, legumes, nuts and seeds), and penalizes for whole fats, sodium, sugar and ldl cholesterol  And, the Diet IQ system additionally rewards complete grains, makes use of only some vitamins in its dedication, and in addition penalizes for saturated fats and sodium. The online outcome for each of those scores is to overemphasize grains, which aren’t nutrient-dense by any goal measure, and deemphasize animal meals.

The Downside of Incomplete Information

There’s one remaining problem to nutrient profiling: incomplete knowledge.

The USA Division of Agriculture maintains arguably essentially the most complete nutrient database on the planet, known as Meals Central, with expanded nutrient knowledge compiled for over 7,000 primary meals and partial nutrient knowledge (at the least what’s required on meals label) for almost 360,000 totally different branded meals. However, even this superb database is lacking some key data. Most of the fundamental entries are lacking measurements for some vitamins (generally vitamin D, vitamin B5, manganese, vitamin K2, and phytosterols) and sure vitamins aren’t included within the database in any respect (together with vitamin B7, iodine, polyphenols, CoQ10, and different practical compounds, together with most phytonutrients). Fiber will not be differentiated between soluble and insoluble, and the strategy used to measure fiber is understood to undercount resistant starch and oligosaccharides.

As well as, the entries typically present common measurements for widespread high quality meals merchandise, so it’s not doable to distinguish the nutrient content material of upper high quality choices. And, whereas many of those gaps may be stuffed in from measurements offered in scientific research, it’s shocking to find how incomplete human information is concerning the nutrient content material of widespread meals.

There’s actually no good resolution, apart from to scour the scientific literature and different databases for as many vitamins as doable lacking from the USDA Meals Central database (which my crew and I are doing), label when a nutrient-density rating is calculated primarily based on incomplete knowledge, and advocate for continued measurements of the nutrient content material of meals.

How the Nutrivore Rating Is Calculated

The Nutrivore Rating is presently essentially the most complete, and least bias, technique for representing the inherent nutrient content material of meals, borne out of a complicated array of comparable, but all flawed, nutrient density scores, whereas recognizing the present limitations posed by incomplete knowledge.

The Nutrivore Rating is calculated primarily based on 32+1 vitamins. The 32 major vitamins that go into the rating are:

The rating is calculated because the sum of every nutrient relative to its RDA or AI current in 100 grams of the meals, divided by the quantity of energy per 100 grams. Information that’s not included within the Meals Central Database are obtained from scientific papers and different databases like Phenol Explorer every time doable. When a number of papers report the quantity of a nutrient for a specific meals, the very best worth is utilized, except there’s a transparent methodological benefit to 1 particular measurement, and supplied it’s no multiple normal deviation from the imply of all obtainable knowledge (during which case, the second highest worth is utilized following the identical statistical check). Additionally, periodically two entries from the Meals Information Central database are amalgamated to calculate the Nutrivore Rating when two highly-related meals (for instance, sockeye salmon and Coho salmon) have incomplete knowledge. That is famous wherever it’s the case.

Additional, the Nutrivore Rating provides the very best worth of obtainable knowledge for one bonus nutrient (that’s the +1), relative to a threshold set utilizing epidemiological research for that nutrient, much like a %DV. The bonus nutrient presently may be any of: glucosinolates (the precursor for isothiocyanates and indoles), thiosulfinates, CoQ10, CLA, betaine, betalains, myo-inositol, ergothioneine, taurine and medium-chain triglycerides. The explanation why just one bonus nutrient is included within the Nutrivore Rating is as a result of incomplete knowledge would imply much less widespread or understudied meals are unnecessarily penalized. The place the extent of a number of vitamins in a meals stay unknown, the Nutrivore Rating is marked with an asterisk to indicate that the rating is probably going underestimated for that meals and ought to be considered a minimal.

The Nutrivore Rating will not be corrected for nutrient bioavailability, nutrient absorption capability, or metabolic conversion inefficiencies. It’s true that particular isoforms of vitamins are extra simply absorbed and/or utilized by the physique. For instance, whereas vitamin K1 accounts for approximate 90% of the whole vitamin Ok within the weight loss program, solely 10 to fifteen% of it’s absorbed within the digestive tract, the online impact being that vitamin K1 accounts for about half of the whole absorbed vitamin Ok, whereas vitamin K2 is very absorbable and represents the remaining 50% (see TWV Podcast Episode 417: Vitamin K2, Hype, or Important?).  Whereas vitamin Ok isoform knowledge is accessible for some meals within the USDA Meals Central database, as a common rule, nutrient isoform knowledge is never obtainable, making correcting for absorption or utilization effectivity of various nutrient kinds inconceivable. It’s additionally true that sure combos of vitamins can both improve or hinder absorption. For instance, vitamin C can improve iron absorption, fat can improve carotenoid and vitamin Ok absorption, however zinc and copper compete for absorption as do calcium and magnesium. Nevertheless, this could’t be accounted for in a nutrient density rating for a person meals as a result of all vitamins current in a whole meal work together. And typically, absorption is influenced by components unbiased of meals. For instance, vitamin D standing influences calcium absorption; a functioning gallbladder is important for environment friendly fats and fat-soluble vitamin absorption; and whereas folic acid is way more readily absorbed within the digestive tract than the energetic type of vitamin B9, L-methylfolate, these with MTHFR gene variants can’t covert folic acid effectively (see Paleo for Being pregnant and Lactation and Genes to Know About: MTHFR). So, as a result of nutrient absorption competitors or facilitation goes past a person meals and is as an alternative associated to the entire meals consumed at a meal in addition to different components corresponding to genetics, it is senseless to right for these in a nutrient profiling technique. The Nutrivore Rating additionally doesn’t incorporate a satiety index, once more as a result of satiety is expounded to macronutrient and water combos from a whole meal fairly than a person meals.

Fairly than penalizing for the presence of vitamins whose extra is related to well being issues (like saturated fat, sodium and sugars), these vitamins are merely not included within the Nutrivore Rating calculation. It’s useful to notice that meals excessive in fat and sugars have a better vitality density, which means extra energy per gram or per serving of meals, which does decrease the Nutrivore Rating. As well as, the presence of antinutrients corresponding to phytates or oxalates aren’t taken under consideration. It is because the affect of antinutrients on nutrient absorption can also be extraordinarily context dependent. For instance, our intestine micro organism can liberate a considerable quantity of the calcium, magnesium, iron, potassium and zinc sure to phytates for us, thereby releasing the sure minerals in addition to phosphorus and thereby enhancing their bioavailability. A wholesome, numerous intestine microbiome can sometimes degrade about half (about 500 to 600 mg each day) of the phytate consumed within the common American weight loss program. Different components influencing bioavailability embody well being of the gastrointestinal tracts, nutrient standing, aggressive binding with different vitamins, meal composition, varied medicine and dietary supplements, time of day and biorhythms, age and gender. It doesn’t make sense to attempt to replicate nutrient digestibility and absorption within the Nutrivore Rating when the system is so complicated and varies from particular person to particular person.

You may consider the Nutrivore Rating as a easy but complete illustration of the inherent vitamins inside a meals, and acknowledge that quite a lot of components will decide whether or not or not your physique absorbs and makes use of all of these vitamins.

As a result of vitamins may be misplaced, shaped and reworked by cooking, the Nutrivore Rating is calculated primarily based on the vitamins throughout the uncooked complete meals, except famous in any other case. Additionally, it’s uncommon for there to be nutrient knowledge for various high quality ranges of a meals. For instance, the Meals Central database comprises just one entry for olive oil, however analysis has proven that the polyphenol content material of virgin olive oil can vary from anyplace between 50 to 5000 mg/kg, and the vitamin E content material can vary from 100 to over 1000 mg/kg. One other instance: though locally-grown, in-season natural greens and fruit and recognized to have greater nutrient density (on account of being grown in greater high quality soil, picked ripe, and eaten a lot sooner after harvest), there are not any separate entries within the Meals Central database for natural versus conventionally-grown produce. Because of this, we are able to consider Nutrivore Scores at the least or common worth and really feel assured that the hassle to hunt out greater high quality choices (grass-fed meat, wild-caught fish, contemporary cold-pressed extra-virgin olive oil, and native in-season greens and fruit) remains to be nutritionally useful if presently not quantifiable.

As extra nutrient knowledge turn into obtainable, the Nutrivore Rating can be up to date to replicate extra full dietary data. This clearly applies to lacking vitamin data from the Meals Central database, however there’s additionally the chance of including vitamins to the Nutrivore Rating calculation sooner or later. For instance, a protein digestibility rating, soluble versus insoluble fiber, hint minerals, practical nonproteinogenic amino acids and peptides, practical fatty acids, and vitamin-like compounds that aren’t presently utilized to calculate the Nutrivore Rating may all be added as soon as there may be adequate knowledge to rationalize their inclusion. For now, extraordinarily sparse knowledge makes this prohibitive, and equally would reward meals merely for being higher studied, not essentially for inherently greater dietary worth, relative to much less widespread meals.

Utilizing the Nutrivore Rating

It’s time for a optimistic strategy to dietary steerage utilizing nutrient density as a primary precept.  The Nutrivore Rating is a mandatory foundational step in direction of attaining this purpose! By understanding the vitamins per calorie supplied by particular person meals by way of the Nutrivore Rating, along with recognition that sure vitamins are unique to particular meals teams, we are able to obtain nutrient sufficiency by select quite a lot of nutrient-dense superfoods in addition to the very best Nutrivore Rating choices from the assorted foundational meals teams.

As I construct Nutrivore.com, the Nutrivore Rating is one in every of a number of instruments that I’m utilizing to speak which meals have essentially the most to supply us. As you may see with the pattern nutrient card above, I’m additionally highlighting the vitamins per serving (fairly than solely contemplating vitamins per calorie), together with that are glorious sources (greater than 20percentDV) and that are good sources (10-20percentDV). I’m combining this dietary data with a evaluate of the scientific literature on the precise well being impacts of consuming a meals, and detailed data on what vitamins do within the physique and the way a lot of them we’d like. And, I’m creating academic assets on find out how to choose varied meals with complementary vitamin to realize nutrient sufficiency!

I’m constructing this web site outdoors of any dietary dogma. Being a Nutrivore is concerning the total high quality of the entire weight loss program, and never a couple of checklist of yes-foods and no-foods. Despite the fact that eliminating empty calorie meals helps to realize nutrient sufficiency with out overeating, no meals is strictly off-limits. On this manner, being a Nutrivore is a weight loss program modifier fairly than a weight loss program itself—a Nutrivore strategy may be layered atop of different dietary buildings and priorities to be able to meet a person’s particular well being wants and objectives.

I see Nutrivore because the pure extension of my science-grounded strategy, and one that may enable me to each degree up the depth of my assets for my long-time readers who love my science deep dives, but additionally meet folks the place they’re and embrace the concept that even a small first step is value celebrating. (See additionally What Is a Nutrivore?, Ditching Weight-reduction plan Dogma, My Private Journey with the Autoimmune Protocol and My Private Journey as a Blogger).

My imaginative and prescient for Nutrivore.com is extraordinarily bold: An in depth academic useful resource devoid of dietary dogma and as an alternative purely primarily based on scientific research and nutrient profiling to quantify nutrient density, all with the purpose of serving to folks obtain dietary nutrient sufficiency (a.okay.a. Nutrivore) via knowledgeable day-to-day decisions.

The Nutrivore Rating is a measure of a lot vitamins, relative to the each day worth (DV), a meals comprises per calorie. A nutrient-dense powerhouse superfood is any meals with a Nutrivore Rating greater than 800. Excessive nutrient-density meals have a Nutrivore Rating between 400 and 800. Medium nutrient-density meals have a Nutrivore Rating between 150 and 400. And, low nutrient-density empty-calorie meals have a nutrivore rating lower than 150. Keep in mind, there are not any yes-foods and no-foods on a Nutrivore strategy, however as an alternative what issues is whether or not the weight loss program as a complete meets the physique’s dietary wants. General dietary nutrient sufficiency is simple to realize by choosing quite a lot of the very best Nutrivore Rating meals inside every meals class.

To date, I’ve calculated the Nutrivore Rating of about over 7,500 totally different meals, and boy there have been some surprises!  Do you know that golden kiwis are a bit extra nutrient-dense than inexperienced kiwis? Or that darkish meat turkey is extra nutrient-dense than gentle meat turkey? Or that maple syrup and molasses have a medium nutrient-density rating and that molasses is extra nutrient-dense than cheese or pears?! Or that Asian pears are essentially the most nutrient-dense Rosaceae household fruit (the apple and stone fruit household). Or that blackberries, strawberries and raspberries are all extra nutrient-dense than blueberries? You’ll be capable to discover all of this data in my new e-book, Information to Nutrivore!

Introducing the Information to Nutrivore E-E-book!

Information to Nutrivore lays the inspiration for Nutrivore as a common well being strategy, a base dietary philosophy devoid of dogma, on high of which you’ll be able to layer extra meals focus or eliminations to fulfill particular person wants. On this sense, being a Nutrivore is a weight loss program modifier fairly than a weight loss program itself.

With this beautifully-designed e-book, you’ll:

• find out how a Nutrivore strategy can enhance well being
• admire what important and nonessential vitamins do within the physique
• get sensible tips about find out how to improve nutrient-density
• study find out how to use the Nutrivore Rating to decide on more healthy meals
• discover detailed vitamin data on the High 100 Nutrivore Rating Meals
• examine the nutrient-density versus energy-density of meals teams
• simply implement Nutrivore with handy-dandy visible guides and reference tables!

The Information to Nutrivore explains find out how to eat a Nutrivore weight loss program and introduces the Nutrivore Rating, essentially the most complete and least-biased technique to evaluate the nutritive worth of particular person meals.  Detailed vitamin data for the High 100 Nutrivore Rating Meals is summarized with stunning graphics for every meals. And, the Information to Nutrivore contains evaluation of meals teams, issues when making ready Nutrivore meals, sensible tricks to improve the nutrient density of your weight loss program, and a look-up desk for the Nutrivore Rating of roughly 300 meals.

Nutrivore Scores of Frequent Meals

And, whilst you watch for Information to Nutrivore and Nutrivore.com, right here’s the Nutrivore Scores of some widespread meals!

• Arugula – 2019
• Avocado – 251
• Beef Liver – 4021
• Bell Peppers, Crimson – 1358
• Blueberries – 396
• Brazil Nuts – 694
• Broccoli – 2833
• Butternut Squash – 670
• Cheddar Cheese – 126
• Chia – 450
• Hen, Breast – 309
• Cremini Mushrooms – 2279
• Eggs – 355
• Garlic – 5622
• Inexperienced Leaf Lettuce – 2245

• Kale – 4233
• Mango – 342
• Oranges – 408
• Oysters – 2255
• Potato – 273
• Rice, White – 66
• Salmon, Wild Atlantic – 868
• Spinach – 4548
• Strawberries – 762
• Sugar, Granulated – 1
• Candy Potato – 379
• Walnuts – 303
• Watercress – 6929
• Wheat Flour, All-Objective – 70
• Yogurt, Greek, Complete – 178

And, don’t neglect to seize my free Nutrivore Rating Information to Meals Teams!

“*” signifies required fields

Citations

Chiuve SE, Sampson L, Willett WC. The affiliation between a dietary high quality index and danger of persistent illness. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Might;40(5):505-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.11.022. PMID: 21496749; PMCID: PMC3100735.

Darmon N, Briend A, Drewnowski A. Vitality-dense diets are related to decrease weight loss program prices: a group examine of French adults. Public Well being Nutr. 2004 Feb;7(1):21-7. doi: 10.1079/phn2003512. PMID: 14972068.

Darmon N, Darmon M, Maillot M, Drewnowski A. A nutrient density normal for greens and fruits: vitamins per calorie and vitamins per unit price. J Am Weight-reduction plan Assoc. 2005 Dec;105(12):1881-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.005. PMID: 16321593.

Drewnowski A , Burton-Freeman B . A brand new category-specific nutrient wealthy meals (NRF9f.3) rating provides flavonoids to evaluate nutrient density of fruit. Meals Funct. 2020 Jan 29;11(1):123-130. doi: 10.1039/c9fo02344e. PMID: 31938797.

Drewnowski A, Dwyer J, King JC, Weaver CM. A proposed nutrient density rating that features meals teams and vitamins to raised align with dietary steerage. Nutr Rev. 2019 Jun 1;77(6):404-416. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz002. PMID: 31222368; PMCID: PMC6489166.

Drewnowski A, Fulgoni V third. Nutrient profiling of meals: making a nutrient-rich meals index. Nutr Rev. 2008 Jan;66(1):23-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.00003.x. PMID: 18254882.

Drewnowski A, Fulgoni VL third. Nutrient density: rules and analysis instruments. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Might;99(5 Suppl):1223S-8S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.073395. Epub 2014 Mar 19. PMID: 24646818.

Drewnowski A, Maillot M, Darmon N. Testing nutrient profile fashions in relation to vitality density and vitality price. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Might;63(5):674-83. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.16. Epub 2008 Feb 20. PMID: 18285808.

Drewnowski A, Smith J, Fulgoni VL third. The New Hybrid Nutrient Density Rating NRFh 4:3:3 Examined in Relation to Reasonably priced Nutrient Density and Wholesome Consuming Index 2015: Analyses of NHANES Information 2013-16. Vitamins. 2021 Might 20;13(5):1734. doi: 10.3390/nu13051734. PMID: 34065287; PMCID: PMC8160959.

Drewnowski A. Idea of a nutritious meals: towards a nutrient density rating. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Oct;82(4):721-32. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/82.4.721. PMID: 16210699.

Drewnowski A. Defining nutrient density: improvement and validation of the nutrient wealthy meals index. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Aug;28(4):421S-426S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2009.10718106. PMID: 20368382.

Drewnowski A. The Nutrient Wealthy Meals Index helps to establish wholesome, inexpensive meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Apr;91(4):1095S-1101S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D. Epub 2010 Feb 24. PMID: 20181811.

Fernández-Ríos A, Laso J, Campos C, Ruiz-Salmón I, Hoehn D, Cristóbal J, Batlle-Bayer L, Bala A, Fullana-I-Palmer P, Puig R, Aldaco R, Margallo M. In the direction of a Water-Vitality-Meals (WEF) nexus index: A evaluate of nutrient profile fashions as a elementary pillar of meals and vitamin safety. Sci Complete Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147936. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147936. Epub 2021 Might 21. PMID: 34082212.

Fulgoni VL third, Keast DR, Drewnowski A. Improvement and validation of the nutrient-rich meals index: a device to measure dietary high quality of meals. J Nutr. 2009 Aug;139(8):1549-54. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.101360. Epub 2009 Jun 23. PMID: 19549759.

Imai C, Takimoto H, Fudono A, Tarui I, Aoyama T, Yago S, Okamitsu M, Sasaki S, Mizutani S, Miyasaka N, Sato N. Utility of the Nutrient-Wealthy Meals Index 9.3 and the Dietary Inflammatory Index for Assessing Maternal Dietary High quality in Japan: A Single-Middle Delivery Cohort Research. Vitamins. 2021 Aug 19;13(8):2854. doi: 10.3390/nu13082854. PMID: 34445014; PMCID: PMC8400739.

Maillot M, Darmon N, Darmon M, Lafay L, Drewnowski A. Nutrient-dense meals teams have excessive vitality prices: an econometric strategy to nutrient profiling. J Nutr. 2007 Jul;137(7):1815-20. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.7.1815. PMID: 17585036.

Miller GD, Drewnowski A, Fulgoni V, Heaney RP, King J, Kennedy E. It’s time for a optimistic strategy to dietary steerage utilizing nutrient density as a primary precept. J Nutr. 2009 Jun;139(6):1198-202. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.100842. Epub 2009 Apr 1. PMID: 19339707.

Mobley AR, Kraemer D, Nicholls J. Placing the nutrient-rich meals index into observe. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009 Aug;28(4):427S-435S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2009.10718107. PMID: 20368383.

Murakami Ok, Livingstone MBE, Fujiwara A, Sasaki S. Utility of the Wholesome Consuming Index-2015 and the Nutrient-Wealthy Meals Index 9.3 for assessing total weight loss program high quality within the Japanese context: Totally different dietary considerations from the US. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):e0228318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228318. PMID: 31999772; PMCID: PMC6992222.

Murakami Ok, Livingstone MBE, Fujiwara A, Sasaki S. Reproducibility and Relative Validity of the Wholesome Consuming Index-2015 and Nutrient-Wealthy Meals Index 9.3 Estimated by Complete and Transient Weight-reduction plan Historical past Questionnaires in Japanese Adults. Vitamins. 2019 Oct 21;11(10):2540. doi: 10.3390/nu11102540. PMID: 31640242; PMCID: PMC6836176.

Streppel MT, Sluik D, van Yperen JF, Geelen A, Hofman A, Franco OH, Witteman JC, Feskens EJ. Nutrient-rich meals, cardiovascular ailments and all-cause mortality: the Rotterdam examine. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014 Jun;68(6):741-7. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.35. Epub 2014 Mar 19. PMID: 24642783.